Previous Entry | Next Entry

Apr. 22nd, 2004

  • 7:02 PM
allaire: (forest)
Cuba withdraws resolution regarding Guantánamo

Geneva (dpa) - Combined with severe reproaches against the USA and the European Union, Cuba has, at a meeting of the UN Human Rights Commission (HRC) in Geneva, withdrawn a resolution regarding the prisoners at the US Military base Guantánamo. The Cuban representative Jorge Ivan Mora Godoy accused Washington on Thursday of having put pressure on the HRC-members to vote against the resolution. He further said that the European Union and several Latin-American countries had made themselves into accomplices. Germany welcomed Cuba's decision to forgo a vote.

The situation of the approx. 600 prisoners on Cuba now is supposed to be discussed at the annual meeting of the HRC in 2005. According to the USA, said prisoners are supposed members of the Taliban or of the terror network El Kaida. The US denies them the status of POWs. Several of them have been imprisoned for more than two years without having been charged. Most have no legal representation.

In the withdrawn resolution the Human Rights Commission had been asked, among other things, to send inspectors to Guatanamo Bay to examine the situation of the prisoners on site. The USA had been asked to provide the information necessary.

22 Apr 04, 12:55
 

Frankly, I'm very disappointed in the German government. The mere existence of Guatanamo is a slap in the face of all the principles that determine a constitutional state. I hate all instances in which a government descends to the same level as terrorists - something both the Israeli government has done by its "liquidations" of Hamas leaders as well as the US who, after 9-11, feel it is their right to deny the most basic of human rights to selected groups of people. They may be terrorists or not - that is for a UN tribunal to decide. It is definitely no reason to fight with the same dirty weapons as they do! A properly elected government should be above that. Oh, wait, George W. Bush and his entourage weren't properly elected. Me bad.

I'd love to know how high the death toll is among the prisoners in Guatanamo Bay. If this isn't a war crime, I don't know what is.

And the wonderful Human Rights Commission is evidently just a bunch of hypocrites... what do they think? Let the prisoners stay there under God knows what conditions for one more year, and perhaps until then, the problem will magically have solved itself? Ostrich symbolism, anyone?

Comments

[identity profile] xkatjafx.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2004 02:38 pm (UTC)
I hear you. Want to read something else that really got me thinking?
http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/kolumnen/mar/17230/1.html
Very interesting.. and the last paragraph just made me *gulp*.
[identity profile] allaire.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2004 10:35 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I know what you mean; it was a very interesting read - and a very desillusioning one as well.

Oh, for something else entirely: Have you already tried out the songvid VCD? Is there any pixelation in the two vids I showed you?
[identity profile] xkatjafx.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2004 01:08 am (UTC)
Track 11 works perfectly. Meaning it's definitely a problem of your DVDplayer. Weird.
ext_7834: (Default)
[identity profile] mareen.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2004 10:22 pm (UTC)
Well, they are now trying to figure out if maybe putting people into prison without a proper lawsuit is MAYBE against the US Constitution. ;-)

The Human Rights Commission is a good idea, problem is they have no jurisdiction in the US, I'm not even sure the US allowed anyone of them on Guantanamo Bay and as far as I know the UN Human Rights Charta never was signed by the United States.

And, you know, we are talking about the Government here that threatened to send Marines to the Netherlands to break them free if ever US citizens are being charged by the International Court of Justice in Den Haag...
[identity profile] allaire.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2004 10:38 pm (UTC)
Well, they are now trying to figure out if maybe putting people into prison without a proper lawsuit is MAYBE against the US Constitution. ;-)

I thought the US Constitution only applied to US citizens? ;-P

as far as I know the UN Human Rights Charta never was signed by the United States.

Just lovely.

And, you know, we are talking about the Government here that threatened to send Marines to the Netherlands to break them free if ever US citizens are being charged by the International Court of Justice in Den Haag...

They actually said that?! Wow.

God. I knew there was a reason I usually stay away from the news - they only make me angry as hell.

We'll see each other on Saturday?
ext_7834: (Default)
[identity profile] mareen.livejournal.com wrote:
Apr. 22nd, 2004 11:43 pm (UTC)
I thought the US Constitution only applied to US citizens? ;-P

Of course! I totally forgot about that. *doh* But it's okay because they are still going to bring all of us Freedom and Democracy!!! YAY!!

They actually said that?! Wow.

They have a law that FORCES the President to free US citizens in a case like that. The law applies to the International Court in Den Haag, too.

We'll see each other on Saturday?

jup. Ich rufe dich noch an. :D


favorites

Latest Month

February 2017
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Designed by [personal profile] chasethestars